Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Amusing Ourselves to Death
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 10 of 13 (152524)
10-24-2004 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by MangyTiger
10-24-2004 12:17 AM


Re: Advertisements
A lot of this reminds me of Marshal MacLuhan. He had some wry observations about the media and the culture. Some sample quotes from him:
  • Only puny secrets need protection. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity.
  • With telephone and TV it is not so much the message as the sender that is
    sent.
  • The car has become the carapace, the protective and aggressive shell, of urban and suburban man.
  • All advertising advertises advertising.
  • The future of the book is the blurb.
  • I read one of his books...Understanding Media I believe was the title. Quite a thinker, this guy. Here is more that I gleaned about his methods:
    Gingkopress writes:
    McLuhan's words stretch and bend, or reverse conventional thinking, providing surprising new contexts and challenges to what he termed the hidden environment. Environments in McLuhan's sense are colossal misconceptions that have little legitimacy in experience. Because they envelop us in a world-view, environments are intrinsically imperceptible. Trapped inside the environment, like Plato's cavemen or fish in a tank, environments escape notice, and make us aware of only a very limited field. An 'environmental thinker' is for McLuhan a gullible actor who merely mimics expertise. Regurgitating concepts cud like, he is blissfully unaware of the closed circuit within which he swims as he surrenders perception. Environments swallow us whole. We depend on an outsider, or a foreign element, or a bygone era, or a radical contrast of any sort, to bring wakefulness. These are called counter-environments. Without them, environments remain imperceptible. Like the distorting imagery of the surrealist, McLuhan's percepts/probes ambush the environmental thinker, the faithful believer in the emperor's new clothes. He is knocked out of his conceptual armor. Anything in opposition to the conventional order can be a counter-environment: new technologies, street art, dream interpretation, crime, novel ideas, cults, minority groups or opinions, any form of satire, anything that topples normalcy and offers a fresh gestalt or disorientation. The bold language of the probe is counter-environmental. It doesn't require truthfulness as such in every case, though it may hit upon it frequently. The purpose of the probe is to stretch the truth in into a what-if mode. Often, the surprise element is saved for the end, as in ''privacy invasion is now one of our most important knowledge industries'', or ''obsolescence is the moment of superabundance''. Claudel's line ''the sky was so blue only blood could be more red'' is typical of the poetic strategy of participation in depth by break-up. Languages that lack sensuous imagery are environmental.
    This message has been edited by Phatboy, 10-24-2004 09:37 AM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 8 by MangyTiger, posted 10-24-2004 12:17 AM MangyTiger has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024