Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Design Revolution by William Dembski
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 4 of 68 (126924)
07-23-2004 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Percy
07-22-2004 11:10 PM


Hi Percy,
I'm an atheist & as PaulK points out, I'm not sure how I could derive morality from naturalism anyway. I suppose my morality is based upon logic & consistency. If I wouldn't like something done to me, then I wouldn't do it to someone else. Were I going to formulate a law, would I hold myself to it as well as everyone else? The answer must be "yes". A whole load of obvious corollaries spring from this. Murder, theft, violence of any sort, become wrong. Pretty much any situation can be solved by the application of "would I consider that fair if it was imposed upon me".
I think "atheistic morality" can only be derived logically, not naturalistically.
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 07-23-2004 07:40 AM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Percy, posted 07-22-2004 11:10 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by DBlevins, posted 07-23-2004 1:05 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 11 of 68 (126992)
07-23-2004 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by DBlevins
07-23-2004 1:05 PM


Re: Naturalistic Morality
DBlevins,
Good point, but the question was how would an atheist derive morality. I agree that all that is held to be moral isn't necessarily consistent, although an example escapes me.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by DBlevins, posted 07-23-2004 1:05 PM DBlevins has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by RAZD, posted 08-07-2004 5:47 PM mark24 has not replied
 Message 59 by DBlevins, posted 08-08-2004 5:49 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5225 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 61 of 68 (131697)
08-08-2004 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by DBlevins
08-08-2004 5:49 PM


Re: Naturalistic Morality
DBlevins,
Yet, I don't think you can derive morality from logic.
Another good point.
Thank you for making me think. My morality (as I have described it previously) is derived from me making observations, noting how it applies to others & ourselves, & then being consistent/logical about the application of it(being as concise as possible).
Owzat?
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 08-08-2004 06:57 PM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by DBlevins, posted 08-08-2004 5:49 PM DBlevins has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024