Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Take the Atheist Challenge!!!
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 125 of 321 (107402)
05-11-2004 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Zachariah
05-06-2004 10:03 PM


Clarification Needed
Zachariah,
What is your definition of an open mind?
According to the dictionary: Open Minded-open to new ideas, not biased.
Before I can take a challenge I need to know we are playing with the same rules. I noticed throughout this thread the comment of one's mind not being open enough keeps popping up.
So are you asking that I be open to new ideas and follow through to check their validity or are you asking me to completely accept what I read with no reliable validation?
I think even Paul praised one of the groups for checking what he said against the scriptures.
So before I take your challenge I need to know your criteria for having an open mind.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Zachariah, posted 05-06-2004 10:03 PM Zachariah has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by Zachariah, posted 05-11-2004 5:08 PM purpledawn has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 141 of 321 (107692)
05-12-2004 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 131 by Zachariah
05-11-2004 5:08 PM


Taking the Challenge
Zacariah,
I'm taking your challenge and reading the book of John. Per my previous message, you know what my criteria is for an open mind.
I started your challenge last night. Here is the prayer I said and will say each time before I start reading so that you know I am sincere in this challenge.
Heavenly Father, I thank you for listening to my prayer. Help me today to seek and find you God. Open my heart and mind as I read this book of John and help me to understand any spiritual truth that it contains. Guide me down the path of true spirituality and show me what is true.
I trust this is an acceptalbe prayer?
My first read through on 5/11/04: I used the NIV study bible
Can't say I care for the prose. Rather choppy and no discernable points of reference so I can see the story. I was unable to get a visual in my mind on this read through.
I will pray and read again tonight. Have a great day!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by Zachariah, posted 05-11-2004 5:08 PM Zachariah has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Zachariah, posted 05-12-2004 5:36 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 175 by riVeRraT, posted 05-13-2004 10:28 AM purpledawn has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 156 of 321 (107852)
05-13-2004 8:39 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by Zachariah
05-12-2004 5:36 PM


Re: Taking the Challenge
Z:
Said my prayer and read the book of John again.
So far no moral teaching has presented itself and no words of wisdom.
I find it disconcerting that the disciple "who testifies to these things and who wrote them down" didn't identify himself by name. Also the "We know that his testimony is true" group is not identified.
The writer does like the parenthetical inserts.
Still baffled on the timeline.
I'll read again tonight. Have a great day!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Zachariah, posted 05-12-2004 5:36 PM Zachariah has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by riVeRraT, posted 05-13-2004 9:41 AM purpledawn has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 227 of 321 (108044)
05-13-2004 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by riVeRraT
05-13-2004 10:28 AM


Re: Taking the Challenge
Your post has a hint of doubt in it. I wrote the prayer, which means I had to think about it and contemplate my request. You don't seem to trust my sincerity. But then you didn't make the challenge.
The original challenge did not include asking Jesus into my heart. In the book of John (which have I mentioned I have read it three times?) no where is it stated that one should ask Jesus into their heart. I'm sticking with the original challenge. I'm requesting that God show me the truth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by riVeRraT, posted 05-13-2004 10:28 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by riVeRraT, posted 05-14-2004 12:31 AM purpledawn has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 278 of 321 (108151)
05-14-2004 7:43 AM
Reply to: Message 234 by riVeRraT
05-14-2004 12:31 AM


Re: Taking the Challenge
quote:
And everyone who calls
on the name of the Lord will be saved
You have the NT (Acts 2) and the OT (Joel 2) saying the same thing. So the question now is "What IS the name of the Lord?"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by riVeRraT, posted 05-14-2004 12:31 AM riVeRraT has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 297 of 321 (108227)
05-14-2004 2:43 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Zachariah
05-12-2004 5:36 PM


Re: Taking the Challenge
This thread seems to have drifted away from the actual challenge, so not sure if anyone is really interested in my endeavor. I have read the book of John 4 times. Twice in the NIV version and twice in the New Century Version, which really is a better read than the NIV. I also prayed sincerely before each reading.
I read the book with an open mind, which means open to new ideas with no bias. So I didn’t assume it was true and I didn’t assume it was false. I asked God to show me the truth (not necessarily your truth) and the below is what I received.
According to John 20:31 the book of John was written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.
To trust in something means I must have confidence that the information given is true. The question for me is does the book of John hold verifiable truth? Here is what came to light.
1. John 21:23-25 Leaves the author and his backers unknown. The disciple who Jesus loved is not identified.
2. The short OT references, which the writer uses to confirm the truth of his writing, don’t really back up the writer’s point. Several are lines taken from Psalms which are songs.
3. None of these references seemed to describe the messiah when the entire scripture was read.
4. Never found the mention of the rising after three days.
5. The whole flesh eating and blood drinking scenario even grossed out the speakers audience. An odd comment since the Jews aren’t supposed to drink blood.
6. John 14:15 If you love me you will keep my commandments. They would seem to be different than God’s commandments. John 15:10 If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love; just as I have kept my father’s commandments and abide in his love. But the commandments of Jesus aren’t given.
7. Testimony: John 5:31-32 If I alone testify about myself, my testimony is not true. There is another who testifies of me, and I know that the testimony which he gives about me is true. That testimony is not written down and it seems that at the time this statement was made John was dead. John 5:35 John was a lamp that burned and gave light, and you chose for a time to enjoy his light. The Pharisees called him on the self testimony in John 8:13 So the Pharisees said to Him, You are testifying about Yourself; Your testimony is not true. But then John 8:14 Jesus answered with Even if I testify about myself, my testimony is true. And with John 8:17-18 Even in your law it has been written that the testimony of two men is true. I am he who testifies about myself, and the father who sent me testifies about me.
8. There are 3rd party conversations that didn’t include the writer or Jesus. John 4:51-53
9. John 7:53-8:11 My bible states that the earliest manuscripts and many other ancient witnesses do not have these verses. This makes that section suspect.
The quotes are full of double talk (if that is the correct term for that). Quite frankly it is like reading a politician’s speech. The rules change to fit the need.
Overall I felt the book was aimed at the people of the time and as I stated before I didn’t really pull any wisdom for the ages out of it.
Dear Zachariah and RiverRat: Your posts lead me to believe that you were hoping for an emotional response. The style of writing in the book of John doesn’t really evoke an emotional response. (That’s how advertising gets you to buy the stuff you don’t need.)
On its own merits the book of John didn’t give me any truths that I can verify today or that would alter my way of life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Zachariah, posted 05-12-2004 5:36 PM Zachariah has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 299 by Zachariah, posted 05-14-2004 4:30 PM purpledawn has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 301 of 321 (108298)
05-14-2004 9:56 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by Zachariah
05-14-2004 4:30 PM


Re: Taking the Challenge
What have I misunderstood?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by Zachariah, posted 05-14-2004 4:30 PM Zachariah has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 316 of 321 (108374)
05-15-2004 8:30 AM
Reply to: Message 300 by Adminnemooseus
05-14-2004 4:35 PM


Re: Closing time soon - Final remarks?
Zachariah made the mistake of assuming that atheists have never read the bible.
As Rrhain wrote:
quote:
You see, atheists are, by and large, raised by theists. They went to church, read the appropriate holy book, did all the rituals, and truly believed.
But it didn't take. They eventually came to realize that it was all a load of hooey. The book didn't provide insight, the rituals did nothing, and that "feeling inside" was nothing more than them convincing themselves that they were supposed to be feeling something even though it wasn't there.
That is my background. I've probably read more of the bible than the average Christian. I was baptised in high school. Although my feeling is that it isn't that religion "didn't take" but that I have spiritually matured beyond the need for a god. Just as when we mature we leave Santa Clause behind. We know reindeer really don't fly.
As my offspring have matured and leave my home, so have I matured and no longer need the image of a being keeping me safe, punishing my transgressors, or guiding my steps.
I know I am a part of the cycle of this world. I wasn't given dominion over this living world. I should respect the planet that sustains me. I know that civilizations come and go, our world continues to change whether in small increments or huge shifts, and this planet will continue without our help until the day it expires.
There are people who need religion or faith in a specific god in their life. That fulfills their need, but don't assume that since I don't need that support that I need to be fixed.
My challenge to a Christian would be to read the bible with a truly open mind as I defined it in my first post (Open to new ideas with no bias). Leave traditions and dogma behind. This does not go against any commandment.
Proverbs 3:13 How happy is the person who finds wisdom and the person who gains understanding.
Have an excellent summer!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-14-2004 4:35 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 317 by crashfrog, posted 05-15-2004 10:23 AM purpledawn has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024