Are there any unexplained branches of evolution?

A small-horse like creature to modern horses? Its still a horse! nothing changed. Just natural selection within the already present information..4 legged mammals to whales???..Are we talking about Pakicetus & Ambulocetus? I recall reading that there was only found a few bone fragments and pieces here and there but was bloated in a transition of whales etc. The legs and arms were pure imagination if i recall.. Dinasaurs and birds? Highly dubious. Cold blood to warm blooded is not an easy task i can tell ya.. Yes there is plenty that scientist must guess!. But dont worry puntuacted quilibrium makes up for all that.

But doesnt evolutionists constantly refer to the fossil record as the evolutionary chain etc?. They say that it shows gradual evolution and transition etc. What are they basing this on?..

How do they know there was billion passenger pidgeons if theres no record?

And i quote from the book "Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science" - page 55 - "No one saw the evolution of one toed horses from three toed horses, but that does not mean we cannot be confident that horses evolved" - So whats the deal here? If theres no such evidence where are they getting this information? My opinion is that its really just the opinions and interpretations of the evolutionists themselves

What evidence? Whats been left behind?. Evolutionists believe they evolved so they must have had 2-3 toes etc. How can they prove or observe such claims? Besides imagination?..

You guys actually believe all that crap?. Such excuses used by evolutionists just dont make sense at all to me. Nothing but excuses to reject God as the creator. Evolutionary genetics yes would show that they must descend somehow. But this is nothing more than evolutionary opinion and imagination. { Can you please stop putting three dots in the subtitle of your post. Thanks. AdminSylas }This message has been edited by AdminSylas, 05-13-2004 01:55 AM