Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why does Richard Dawkins sing Christmas carols?
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 191 of 301 (442387)
12-20-2007 11:58 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Silent H
12-20-2007 10:58 PM


Re: On the Hypocrisy of Dawkins and his supporters...
Silent H writes:
quote:
I have found it quite amusing to read Dawkins's supporters trying to evade the very obvious, that he is being a hypocrite.
Logical category error of division: That because Christianity as a whole is bad (in Dawkins' view), then that would mean that each individual part of it is bad, too.
Are you saying it is impossible to find something beautiful even though you don't appreciate the way in which it was produced? It is impossible to dislike Christianity and find it delusional and a source of great evil while recognizing that there is something good to be had in having a ritual of recognizing brotherhood and the connectedness of humanity?
As the cliche goes, "It's a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there."

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Silent H, posted 12-20-2007 10:58 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Silent H, posted 12-22-2007 10:08 PM Rrhain has replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 232 of 301 (443085)
12-23-2007 6:11 PM
Reply to: Message 223 by Silent H
12-22-2007 10:08 PM


Re: On the Hypocrisy of Dawkins and his supporters...
Silent H responds to me:
quote:
I'm not sure why a person who finds religion so awful would want to use those rituals as the glue.
Because it's already pervasive. We here in the West live in a predominantly Christian culture. The imagery and culture are overwhelmingly tilted in its favor. Pretty much everyone will have Tuesday off.
So why fight it? It is extremely difficult to change cultural attitudes wholesale. You have to work with what you have. That's how Christianity did it: Christmas was once a pagan festival. So was Easter. And now, most current Christians have no understanding of the original intent behind the traditions they still carry out. They give their kids chocolate rabbits and eggs and don't give it a second thought.
I can't tell you how many times I've received gelt at the homes of Christians. They don't know why they're giving out chocolate coins...all they know is that it's the kind of chocolate that shows up in December. They have no concept of the Jewish tradition behind it.
quote:
Second, Dawkins has championed the concept of memes. He states that the god meme is viral. It is rather odd to believe maintaining arcane rituals and music based around faith in gods, is somehow going to diminish the presence of this meme.
But again, not if you are working to change it. It is harder to displace a meme than to evolve it. One of the most popular Christmas carols of all time was written by a Russian Jew regarding his experience in Los Angeles:
The sun is shining
The grass is green
The orange and palms trees sway
There's never been such a day
In Beverly Hills, LA
But it's December the 24th
And I'm longing to be up north
I'm dreaming of a white Christmas
Just like the ones I used to know
Other than the superficial use of the word "Christmas," there's no mention of god or Jesus. There's only the barest hint of a reference to Santa. The main thrust of the piece is the sentimentality of winter. It lets you provide the meaning of what "Christmas" is.
How much easier to have religion slip away than to provide popular substitutes? They let you keep the need for ritual while changing the message. Instead of "Silent Night" and "O Little Town of Bethlehem," you start singing "Jingle Bells" and "Sleighride."
quote:
Other than historically, how would it help?
Why are you denigrating the historical?
quote:
Thirdly, he argues that moderates empower fundamentalists. His use of religious material and practices most certainly empowers moderates. That would seem to be inconsistent.
Not if you're moving the moderates toward your position. Again, if you are leaching the religious understory out of the ritual, then it would be a bad idea to stake such a contrasting position that you can't find common ground. Like it or not, people need ritual. We have an amazingly entrenched ritual in our culture. It has already been changed from one form into another and it was done not by doing away with it but by co-opting it.
So why not do it again?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Silent H, posted 12-22-2007 10:08 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 238 by Silent H, posted 12-24-2007 12:10 AM Rrhain has replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 255 of 301 (443456)
12-25-2007 5:15 AM
Reply to: Message 238 by Silent H
12-24-2007 12:10 AM


Re: On the Hypocrisy of Dawkins and his supporters...
Silent H responds to me:
quote:
My only counter to what you said is that there are plenty of secular holiday festivities, including songs, and plenty of great secular works of art he could enjoy.
So? The culture in which we live is overwhelmingly sectarian. Again, pretty much everybody in Europe, the Americas, and Australia are going to have Tuesday off. Why fight it?
quote:
Where is he arguing or actually changing the meme within the art?
By being an atheist who engages in ritual on a particular day. Since he doesn't believe in god, he is not venerating god. Instead, he has another point to make with regard to the ritual.
quote:
but then I think he should start having sympathy with moderates if he's going to continue enjoying their works.
Why? The moderates are always going to be pulling for the sectarian message. He needs to get them on his side so that the fundamentalists are all alone.
quote:
He's pulling down the priests (and their teachings), so he can take his place at the pulpit.
It's hard to do that when the entire gist of your position is that there is no pulpit.
quote:
While he can pull a Martin Luther if he wants, it is a bit hypocritical.
Who said Martin Luther? I wasn't talking about him. I was talking about the shift from pagan to Christian imagery. Dawkins doesn't have a problem with the concept of ritual. And he doesn't even have a problem with the larger form of the ritual. He's just changing the point.
quote:
It shows too much interest, or reliance, on the very structure he lambastes.
Huh? He's surrounded by theists. How can he get to the place where he would like to be when there is nowhere he can go to escape? Four continents are going to be taking the same day off. You don't fight that by trying to replace it wholesale. Instead, you co-opt it.
It worked before. Why not do it again?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 238 by Silent H, posted 12-24-2007 12:10 AM Silent H has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 257 of 301 (443463)
12-25-2007 7:17 AM
Reply to: Message 241 by Hyroglyphx
12-24-2007 1:33 AM


Re: My two cents
Nemesis Juggernaut writes:
quote:
Gay people do exist. So do people who get off by eating feces. Wouldn't call either normalcy though.
And you wonder why people think you're a bigot.
Do not feed the trolls, people.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 241 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2007 1:33 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 258 of 301 (443464)
12-25-2007 7:22 AM
Reply to: Message 252 by Hyroglyphx
12-24-2007 9:44 PM


Re: My two cents
Nemesis Juggernaut writes:
quote:
I had to pick some obviously vile to say that while it exists, it doesn't somehow mean that its existence is inherently good.
And you wonder why people think you're a bigot?
Do not feed the trolls, people.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2007 9:44 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024