Ben has recognized quite perceptively that my own ideas are still somewhat changing. That is true.
I started e\/c related internet postings originally out of the hope to present some creationist attitudes that WERE NOT PROPERLY presented enmass, as I learned... by BOTH viewing TalkOr.. and subsequently contributing to ICR's FORUM. I had no need to contribute initally to every evolutionary content as was being news grouped, so to say, in general. I was not a part of the lined disucussion as far back as Percy witnessed. I did however experience the full spectrum of the content in my family as I grew up, so... the web does not and never did provide me personally with any better understanding of the differences than I had already experienced at home, school, 4-H, and through reading non-electronic sources.
In that systematic approach to getting the 5 positions related to science and religion I had read on my own (relative to biology)(the changes in my own ideas relate to learning technical IT things and some physcis I did not have by rote) and had made into 2-1/2 hours of (some live call inS)T\/, I gravitated"" to EVC because of the science context. I was not really aware of how the thread seperation was working until I had had my own dedicated network connection at home, however.
My own contributions have become increasingly scientific and less religiously timbred but the web INvironMENT definitely permits the expansive thought I was having personally to be documented and available in retrospect at least to those future oriented thinkers who are not satisified with science as usual. There is a definite need to expand the boundary of science and religion and the net is great gross way to acommplish that.
Within my general slant to favor certain attitudes that I have come to find through the recent years to exist"" virtually in the MINDS (as opposed to the hit and run posters lingo as that could also suggest in a false fact etc) of EVCerS, errrrrr, I have also been more or less guided"" by the form of EvC, to develop my science further or suffer the less magnificant fate of having an ADMIN comment. I have however NEVER read Percy's comments to me as anything but positive.
--the fantastic FIVE::--philosophical math----philosophical chem----evolution by force--- creation ex n---0...-&-panbiogeograpy!
If I am lucky and the clover is a lover of this five fingered writing I do more or less by intuition (and experience etc)it might be that soemthing more than curiousity will be the history of EvC to culture and of my own "legacy"(to be a bit purplishly proud). The suggestion I made a few years ago to develop the Darwinian extension for macrothermodyanmics which resulted in Dr. Glayshev citing EVC in regular text and autographing a copy of his book to me was enough for my own use of EVC and any autobiographical material possibly gleanable from prior posts here, but indeed, I have forged on and continue both to raise creation and science so as to proove, beyond the lemon of the vehicle being tested, to politicos that creation is teachable (in a very narrow width viewable on EVC) in such an environment cev etc, that raises both science and religion. There is a case sensensitve environs (Fined again wake shem) on both sides hence no sand painting continuity (no investigation) but we called that "debate" i would rebate or discount.
Yet, indeed this remains to be more properly objectified. The lastest thoughts that I have had about carbon shifting codes in side chains continuous with differential equations non-Laplacian I have yet to set out in a dense post but I have been able thanks to EVC to go beyond the simple information circuit I called in 92 while working for the Animal Science Dept at CU "centriolar cycle" into one that explains my CREATIONIST equivalence I got from Duane Gish on the difference in my own mind of a "side chain" and a "functional group". It is a tribute and attribute of the design of EVC that I have outsource my own carbon that would have stayed only with the anthropic principle. It does not. More later. Brad.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 08-01-2005 11:21 AM
™ Version 4.2
