Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scotus rules 2nd amendment is an individual right
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 28 of 176 (475439)
07-15-2008 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Chiroptera
07-15-2008 8:40 PM


... and "arms" c. late 18th century
quote:
I think it's to do with whether the constitution was really talking about people bearing arms as militias to prevent evil European monarchies re-colonising the fledgeling country...
...or people bearing arms to prevent the federal U.S. government from straying too far from its proper role. The Antifederalists (who gave us the Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment) were afraid of the military and police powers of the proposed central government.
That is also my understanding. You said it better than I could - Fortunately I saw your message before posting my own.
I find it interesting how the wingnut conservatives in the U.S. constantly harp about the "original intents of the Founding Fathers"...
Just think what "arms" were back in that time. I certainly don't fear people having single shot, mussel loading pistols and rifles. Arms technology has come a long way since then.
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Chiroptera, posted 07-15-2008 8:40 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024