Okay, if two species "evolve" on different sides of a mountain range,
eventually they will meet one another, and at that time, which ever one has advanced the most will dominate for resources and supremecy. So it is a race, isn't it? Who can become the most highly adapted the quickest? What if monkies had learned how to weild spears and axes? According to evolution, they would become the top species, right? Or am I wrong? I hate having to ask that, but although I beleive in Creationism, I still try to learn all I can about evolution.
While that is one possibility it is not the most common outcome. One great example is to look at the primates. The humans, chimps, gorillas and bonobos all developed in pretty much the same area and over about the same period. But each occupied a different ecological niche. You can see it in some of the other primates as well, where many different species of monkey live in the same area.
In fact, in most cases many different species live side by side without one species wiping out the other. Just look most anywhere. Look at the variety of antelope that exist side-by-side, or big cats, lions, cheetahs and leopards that we are all familar with but also the smaller serval, caracal, swamp cat, golden cat, sand cat and secretive black-footed cat.
Look at the plant world where many species make up an environment and at the world of birds, or butterflies, the number of bats that live side-by-side. In Texas alone there are 33 species of bats, 484 species of birds and over 300 species of butterflies that live down here in the Rio Grande Valley.
The most common thing we see is not one species dominating over another but rather each species living within a unique niche.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion