Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,922 Year: 4,179/9,624 Month: 1,050/974 Week: 9/368 Day: 9/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Define "Kind"
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 43 of 300 (289155)
02-21-2006 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Faith
02-21-2006 12:43 PM


Re: Further clarification
Faith
Of course not, and intuitively I don't see all that much similarity either, the way I do between bears and raccoons.
What is the similarity you intuitively see between bears and racoons Faith?
This message has been edited by sidelined, Tue, 2006-02-21 10:48 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 02-21-2006 12:43 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Faith, posted 02-21-2006 12:50 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 51 of 300 (289170)
02-21-2006 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Faith
02-21-2006 12:50 PM


Re: Further clarification
Faith
The fat lumbering body, the general shape of the face, the "hands" that wash its food, its way of standing on its hind legs at times.
And yet you can see no corresponding likeness between primates and humans?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Faith, posted 02-21-2006 12:50 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 02-21-2006 1:10 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 60 of 300 (289199)
02-21-2006 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Faith
02-21-2006 1:10 PM


Re: Further clarification
Faith
It was not any more so with the bear and racoon though. And genetically the primates share a greater amount than do bears and racoons. Indeed there are all sorts of counterintuitive connections in the animal world revealed through genetics

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 02-21-2006 1:10 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Faith, posted 02-21-2006 2:20 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 271 of 300 (291973)
03-04-2006 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 266 by Faith
03-03-2006 9:53 PM


Re: Kind of a red herring
Faith
The existence of fossils all over the earth in the great abundance they are found, everywhere, is fantastic evidence for a worldwide flood
There are even found on the continent of Antartica both plant and meat eating dinosaur fossils. One must ask how this continent was able to support such animals since it is obvious that the plant eaters must also consume plants and there is an {iaverage[/i] thickness of ice of 7000 feet.How did plant life grow at the extreme cold of Antarctic's climate to support such massive creatures as these?
So please explain this. From the time of Noah until now the Antarctic continent had to lay down an average thickness of ice nearly 1.5 miles thick. We find fossils of dinosaurs there of both plant eating and meat eating variety, yet after the flood none of them returned to this land to live. In fact,there are no dinosaurs alive today,so what happened to the ones that Noah brought aboard?
This message has been edited by sidelined, Sat, 2006-03-04 12:35 AM

Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Douglas Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by Faith, posted 03-03-2006 9:53 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by Faith, posted 03-04-2006 3:31 AM sidelined has replied
 Message 287 by Faith, posted 06-18-2006 9:47 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 273 of 300 (291979)
03-04-2006 4:01 AM
Reply to: Message 272 by Faith
03-04-2006 3:31 AM


Re: Kind of a red herring
Faith
Why should there be a problem for the idea of the flood in any of that?
Antarctica was a lush plant producing supplier of food to dinosaurs. How can this have occured when it is in the location it is with an ice covering of 1.5 miles? After the flood where would the ice have come from since after a year beneath the ocean it would have melted away? Oops, it cannot have melted away since it was not ice before the flood because the fossils there indicate that the land was rich in plant material to support plant eating dinosaurs.
But if there were no ice after the flood where did all the ice today come from?
Also, it is weird to think of how plant life could manage to eek out an existence enough to supply large warm blooded animals with a food supply if 5 months of the year there were not enough sunlight to drive photosynthesis.
Do you begin to see the difficulties here? These are not the only ones.
This message has been edited by sidelined, Sat, 2006-03-04 02:07 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by Faith, posted 03-04-2006 3:31 AM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024