A question, though, is how many of these scientists are actually engaged in scientific research (as opposed to publishing "critiques" of evolutionary papers or other apologetics essays)?
Of the research that is being done, how much of it is actually an advancement of human knowledge, and can be replicated by other scientists?
Finally, how much of this research is based on the creationist paradigm?
"Religion is the best business to be in. It's the only one where the customers blame themselves for product failure."
-- Ellis Weiner (quoted on the NAiG message board)