Are human tails an example of macroevolution?

Oooh, let me do this one.* puts on magic creationist hat *There's nothing in the Bible to say that humans weren't originally created with tails. (Of course, there's nothing to say we were, but I can add anything I like to the Bible to save the appearances.) So humanity originally had tails. We subsequently lost 'em 'cos the genome is degrading, donchaknow? (A scientific fact I made up. I'm allowed to do that too.) Occasionally, enough of the fragmented genes are brought together by recombination (a statement I have not even tried to prove, and won't) that some child is born with a tail.Damn, I see why for some people this has more appeal than actual science. It's easier.

Or that "may" not be how scientists do science. Could you provide us with more than self-serving speculation? No.Where on earth did you get this strange, strange idea?No anthropologist would tell you that. Not one.---Before you start going around telling people what scientists think and why they think it, do you not suppose that you have some sort of obligation to find out what they do, in fact, think, and the reasons why they do, in fact, think it?Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.