Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Rodent speciation and Noah's Ark.
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 21 of 31 (275831)
01-04-2006 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by pink sasquatch
01-04-2006 4:32 PM


Re: a general reply: serious issues with evo arguments
Great post, pink sasquatch. You can treat this as a seconding of your POTM nomination.
Let me offer a mea culpa. I saw some of the problems you mention, yet did not post on them. In retrospect, I should have.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by pink sasquatch, posted 01-04-2006 4:32 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 25 of 31 (275883)
01-04-2006 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Yaro
01-04-2006 6:33 PM


Re: a general reply: serious issues with evo arguments
Is there such a thing as "genetic potential"?
Let me comment on what I see as the problem. And I won't use "genetic potential" since I'm a bit hazy as to what that means.
The house mouse is specialized for a particular niche. The beaver is specialized for a rather different niche.
Normally when we talk of mouse and beaver having a common ancestor, we assume that ancestor is relatively less specialized, and descendents just specialized in two or more different ways. It might be a lot more difficult for a house mouse to evolve in ways that causes it to lose its current specialization, then evolve a different specialization.
Going back to the Noah's flood scenario, with rapid evolution, the assumption could be that the rodents on the ark were relatively unspecialized, so could more rapidly evolve into a number of more specialized niches.
I don't expect it could possibly happen in the time available, and pink sasquatch probably doesn't either. However, the point remains that the evolution problem that needed to be solved might be significantly simpler than the one you used for comparison.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Yaro, posted 01-04-2006 6:33 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024