John Paul wrote:
It's funny that you bring up bats because there isn't any fossil evidence for their alleged evolution. If bat's wings were just elongated arms/ fingers then it would be a given that the genes that govern the limbs/ fingers were what mutated. What happens if embryology falsifies that notion? BTW, homolgy has been falsified for years.
Look up fossilization. If an organism isn't buried within 2 years tops it will not fossilize, it will deteriorate. Trace fossils left on the surface will erode.
Flying squirrels glide, they don't fly. A variation of a regular squirrel. No big deal.
It's a page back, but I have to comment on this post.
This is possibly the most dis-ingenous post I have ever seen. What the heck goes on in the minds of these people? The first paragraph is just incredible. A bizarre, illogical eclectic collection of sentences purely designed to keep the flag waving at all costs.
I honestly cannot imagine that anyone could do what he does in good faith. Either his agenda is to intentionally deceive in order to promote his faith, or he has such an emotional investment in Creationism that logical thought fails him.
My greatest respect to you guys that can repeatedly respond to this stuff patiently and calmly. I sure as heck couldn't.
™ Version 4.2
