No it isn't. I initially copied the information from the book, changed a number of things, added things and reworded things. It is not a cut and paste. You can google books it and read the original article and see the difference yourself.
I have never seen those two articles, wise guy. I admitted that I gleaned the info from the book. That is why I left certain references in the article so that people could look up those things in the book.
Of course, I would never attempt to sell that article or turn it in for a college paper or it would be too close and would be considered plagiarism.
I already admitted in the original post exactly where it came from. I also admitted that I changed a number of things for various reasons. Obviously there were many statements that were word for word. I even gave the link to the article I took it from.