Sumer writes:
We were discussing OOL calculation by Hoyle. What does TOE have to do with it? Where did we discuss it in this post? Isn't it true that the majority of the evolutionists SPECIFICALLY draw a distinction between abiogenesis and speciation?
the calculation is also irrelevant for the theory of abiogenesis.
Let me play a little game over here. Let's assume that I made your comment (changing the word "wrong" for "right," of course).
"The probability calculation is RIGHT because it is calculating the probability of something that IS relevant to the theory of evolution."
there is no symmetry here. If something is irrelevant, it is wrong to apply its conclusions even if there are no obvios math mistakes. On the other hand, if something is relevant, that does not make its conclusions necessarily correct.
In other words, the standard for something being correct is not symmetric to the standard of it being wrong. For something to be correct ALL its logical steps must be correct. For something to be wrong it is enough that ONE step be wrong.