It's no use. Evolutionists conveniently divorce themselves from explanations of abiogenesis because they have absolutely no explanation of how it is possible.
Since some intial explanations of how this is possible has been posted in the last 24 hours and references to sites with experiments this statement is not true.
The simplest concievable form of life as we know it would require at least one strand of DNA or RNA.
The simplest concievable form of imperfect replicator is not as complex as RNA -- that has also been posted here in the last 24 hours. And, as has been noted in the last day, life "as we know it" is not what is expected at the origin of life -- far from it.
It appears you have a reading problem. If this continues you will have a 24 hour break where all you can do is read for the practice.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 09-29-2005 10:45 PM
™ Version 4.2