Exodus Revealed (Part 2)

OK to try and get this back on track - let's try the following, if evidence has been found that supports the claims made by Ron Wyatt, is it possible to produce a list (which we would then debate) using the following template:EVIDENCE ITEM 1: What is it?WHICH LAB CONDUCTED INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION?WHEN WAS THIS CONDUCTED?WHAT TESTS WERE PERFORMED?WHAT WAS THE OUTCOME OF THIS INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION?WHERE IS THE DOCUMENTATION AROUND THE VERIFICATION AVAILABLE?The thread has got slightly unfocused and I think this would allow to proceed in a more focused manner.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-04-2004 12:48 PMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-04-2004 12:57 PM

I would ask those who don't believe those claims to allow a supporter a chance to complete the "template" for us to examine. It is pointless, getting into another Yah-boo-hoo - so let's try and get more systematic.Supporters when you complete those questions - please avoid terms like Excellent, convincing, good etc - purely the facts. For example when naming the lab conducting the research - we do not require a lenghty trait about the "world-class" research done there - just the name.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-04-2004 12:54 PMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-04-2004 01:32 PM

I would rather we didn't as much of it would be beyond the narrow focus on the evidence that I am trying to encourage.Let's give the strong evidence a change to speak !

Admin - can we have the off-topic posts, edited/removed?I do not want this disrailed before it has began.I would ask posters to refer to my post 1 - that is the matter under discussion.

This is not debating in good faith, if you do not wish to join the debate as it is set-out I would ask that you refrain from further posts.I am not asking for great detail - one sentence per question is fine, it gives us a point to start serious debate.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-04-2004 03:00 PM

Right - this is a general reply - since shouting at each other seems better than topic on the top and you now have got the topic closed in 15 minutes I am going to suggest the following.I'll take any two wyatt-drones in a straight "strict" two on one debate - same first post as this one.How does that sound Admin (I can't remember which forum this occurs in)?Basically I'm calling you out - put up or shut up you bullshitters.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-04-2004 03:26 PM