kendemeyer writes:
Third, a major complaint you have is that miracles cannot be considered historical. I do not see where you proved that assertion.
That's easy. Assertions of the historicity of particular supernatural events aribtrarily assume the ABSENCE of supernatural effects in the connection between the event in question and our present observatory faculties. In other words, you must baselessly assume that you are not being deceived by a supernatural trickster. It begs the question to assert that you can verify a particular supernatural event when you can't falsify the alternative explanations.
™ Version 4.2