Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Independent Historical Corroboration for Biblical Events
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 212 (15883)
08-21-2002 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Me
08-21-2002 3:42 PM


Me
Respectfully, you are plain wrong.
There are actaully TWO ways to do it:
1. Take it with pinches of salt when you can't believe it
or
2. Take it literally and believe that when it sounds like a bizaree event the Bible is, indeed, discussing a bizaree event.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Me, posted 08-21-2002 3:42 PM Me has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Me, posted 08-22-2002 10:06 AM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 212 (15919)
08-22-2002 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Me
08-22-2002 10:06 AM


^
I was just being a smart alec and responding to your somewhat pompous sounding 'this is the way to do it'. There simply are two ways to do it.
Christ's parables were clearly parables. The writer of Hebrews praises David's, Moses', Abraham's and Noah's deeds but not those of any characters of the parables! That arguement could be won by a grade six student in a primary school debate. Genesis clearly aims to describe the origin of things and a world wide flood that deluged the world.
We have a book claiming quite openly to be the revelation of God to man. Why not believe creation and the flood if one can belive in the resurrection of Christ?
If Christ was really raised we live in a very differnt world than the one a real evolutionst believes in. This world is one with the Triune God who raised his son who died on a cross for the sake of mankind. Why should Christians doubt the flood? It is utterly, utterly ludicrous IMO.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Me, posted 08-22-2002 10:06 AM Me has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-22-2002 11:08 AM Tranquility Base has replied
 Message 61 by Me, posted 08-23-2002 8:59 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 212 (15956)
08-22-2002 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Minnemooseus
08-22-2002 11:08 AM


Moose
The continual claim here doubting the faithfulness of the transcriptions and translations of Scripture fly in the face of learned mainstream discourse on the subject. You all simply pretend that the Scriptures bear no resemblance to those that David would have read. You are completely wrong on that subject.
And the fact that you wont even acknolweldge that we say that the marine innundations world wide are the flood proves that you are not participating in helful discussion. You know our POV.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-22-2002 11:08 AM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by John, posted 08-22-2002 10:21 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 58 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-23-2002 1:43 AM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 212 (15983)
08-23-2002 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Minnemooseus
08-23-2002 1:43 AM


^
We all know that due to erosion it is a major headache to try and reconstruct the geology of any area. Even when it is done one can never be sure.
We can be far more sure that what we read in Scripture today is pretty much what David was reading becasue of the obsession with histroy and genealogy that the Jews/Hebrews had.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-23-2002 1:43 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by John, posted 08-23-2002 8:41 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024