Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,919 Year: 4,176/9,624 Month: 1,047/974 Week: 6/368 Day: 6/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible and the Hittites, Exploding another 'Biblical Archaeology' Myth.
Tsegamla
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 53 (68543)
11-22-2003 1:19 PM


So, why did they call them Hittites? When they found that the Anatolian kingdom didn't ever really give itself a name, did some guy just say something like, "Hey, guys! Looks like we found us the missing Hittites over here!" out of sarcasm? Were they just putting a name with no people together with a people with no name?

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by JIM, posted 11-22-2003 4:22 PM Tsegamla has not replied
 Message 12 by Brian, posted 11-23-2003 4:52 AM Tsegamla has replied

  
Tsegamla
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 53 (68731)
11-23-2003 10:53 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Brian
11-23-2003 4:52 AM


I understand that they were given the name 'Hittites'. My question is more on the subject of why that particular term was chosen. Did the original archaeologists who discovered the kingdom think it was the Biblical Hittite kingdom, so they named it that, but later it turned out not to be, but the name stuck?
I just don't see why they weren't named the 'Hattites' or something similar. JIM's explanation makes sense, that somehow the pronunciations got mixed up and it turned into 'Hittite'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Brian, posted 11-23-2003 4:52 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by rosa, posted 11-24-2003 7:22 PM Tsegamla has not replied
 Message 15 by Brian, posted 11-26-2003 5:42 PM Tsegamla has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024