Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is the biggest bible contradiction?
timothy44
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 311 (368685)
12-09-2006 3:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Neutralmind
11-21-2006 10:06 AM


There are no Bible contradictions - there are merely bad Bible exegesis practioners.
I would challenge anyone claiming there is a Bible contradiction to do the following 8 steps of Bible exegesis in relation to their alleged Bible contradictions:
quote:
The rules of exegesis:
Gordon D. Fee, in his New Testament Exegesis, p 27, states simply, “Exegesis . answers the question, What did the biblical author mean? It has to do both with what he said (the content itself) and why he said it at any given point (the literary context). Furthermore, exegesis is primarily concerned with intentionality: What did the author intend his original readers to understand?”
Before we can determine what a given text might mean for us today, we must establish what it meant for its original audience.
This is the process of exegesis. In this article, we will lay out the fundamental rules, of which there are eight. In future articles, we will elaborate on each one from a nuts & bolts perspective. The rules listed are taken directly from Prof. Fee’s excellent book (p. 32), mentioned in the paragraph above.
Rules of Bible exegesis
Rule No. 1: Survey the historical context in general.
Rule No. 2: Confirm the limits of the passage.
Rule No. 3: Become thoroughly acquainted with your paragraph or pericope
Rule No. 4: Analyze sentence structures and syntactical relationships.
Rule No. 5: Establish the text.
Rule No. 6: Analyze the grammar.
Rule No. 7: Analyze significant words.
Rule No. 8: Research the historical-cultural background.
Godward.org
Edited by timothy44, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Neutralmind, posted 11-21-2006 10:06 AM Neutralmind has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Brian, posted 12-09-2006 4:22 PM timothy44 has replied
 Message 156 by Chiroptera, posted 12-09-2006 5:22 PM timothy44 has not replied
 Message 159 by arachnophilia, posted 12-09-2006 8:50 PM timothy44 has not replied

timothy44
Inactive Member


Message 154 of 311 (368704)
12-09-2006 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Brian
12-09-2006 4:22 PM


Re: I wonder if there is a Fee attached?
Brian,
You wrote:
quote:
If anyone claims that the Bible is inerrant, they simply haven't studied the Bible.
Are you saying that the Bible scholars/theologians like Norman Geisler, James Boice, Carl F. H. Henry, Kenneth Kantzer, J. I. Packer, Francis Schaeffer, John MacArthur, and R. C. Sproul did not study their Bibles? Are you saying the same regarding the 200 signers of the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy?
I think you would do well to demonstrate your contention via the 8 steps I cited.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Brian, posted 12-09-2006 4:22 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by Brian, posted 12-09-2006 5:04 PM timothy44 has not replied
 Message 157 by Brian, posted 12-09-2006 5:41 PM timothy44 has not replied
 Message 160 by arachnophilia, posted 12-09-2006 9:06 PM timothy44 has not replied
 Message 172 by ramoss, posted 12-11-2006 9:30 AM timothy44 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024