While the errancy of the Bible disproves the idea that God directly produced the Bible I have to ask why "inspiration" must be interpreted in this way. If the Bible is even partly a human creation the idea that it is GOd's creation falls and with it the whole argument.
So far as I can see this view of "inspiration" is a questionable interpretation of a single verse in an epistle that is generally regarded by scholars as pseudonymous. If that is the case then this issue represents a major weak point in the argument.
™ Version 4.2