Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is to be taken literally?
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 18 of 81 (157321)
11-08-2004 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Proboscis
11-08-2004 1:39 PM


Not at all obvious
If you don't accept Genesis, you obviously just want to believe in Evolution just so you can "fit in" with some of the most influencial scientists in the country.
This is, of course, not at all obvious. It is generally a very bad idea to be telling others what they think, feel or the reasons for their actions. That is especially true with the very small amount of information that you have from what is posted to this board.
I might also ask you why you wouldn't want to look at what close enough to all the influential scientists of the world have concluded. Concluded after decades of data gathering and careful analsysis. Information and logic that it is "obvious" that you know nearly nothing about. (see, how do you feel being told something about yourself based on very little information)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Proboscis, posted 11-08-2004 1:39 PM Proboscis has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Proboscis, posted 11-10-2004 1:33 PM NosyNed has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 46 of 81 (158027)
11-10-2004 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Proboscis
11-10-2004 1:33 PM


Hardly any reasons to doubt genesis
Ok here we go, first what I meant was that there are HARDLY ANY reasons why else NOT to accept Genesis.
Other than it is wrong! That is why literal Bible believers gave it up a couple of centuries ago and why the majority of Christians today understand that it is not a science text book.
The reason it isn't accepted is there is ample evidence that show that the common, literal interpretations are incorrect when measured against the real world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Proboscis, posted 11-10-2004 1:33 PM Proboscis has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Proboscis, posted 11-10-2004 1:59 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024