Today there are fish and amphibians. In the fossil record there are fish and amphibians.
Yet, you accept that fish turned into amphibians, right?
You are right this is not the forum to discuss that. What I wanted to comment on was my surprise and disappointment.
I've been thinking you were at least a little bit knowlegable and sensible now you blow that up by making a reference to the most unknowlegable kind of statment made by the worst of the creationists. It hints that you no absolutely nothing and, worse, are unable to reason in a coherent way. There should be no need to discuss this at all you should be able to work it out for yourself.
Too bad but I guess I allowed my expectations to build up a bit too much.