Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheist vs Agnostic
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 52 of 111 (189587)
03-02-2005 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by coffee_addict
03-01-2005 6:18 PM


Pink Elephants have a small following
Hector...(I like the name Jacen better) Here is my take on it:
Premise: God does not exist
Observation: I believe that I experienced God but can produce no proof. Many others that I have talked with have had similar encounters.
Conclusion: God may exist.
Objection: The lack of evidence does not mean something did not happen or is not possible or does not exist.All have not experienced the same thing.Still, without proof, it is a matter of belief.
Premise: Pink Elephants may exist.
Observation: I have never experienced pink elephants nor has anyone whom I have ever talked to. Perhaps isolated mental patients could claim such an encounter.
Conclusion: Pink Elephants still may exist, but there is much less human testimony in favor of them than with God.
Objection: Without any proof, it is all a matter of belief.
Premise: Religion is a fairy tale.
Observation: Religion has caused much turmoil and much passionate extremist beliefs within humanity.
Conclusion: The beliefs within religion are more than mere fairy tales. Much is invested in these personal beliefs.
Objection:Why can't everyone just be rational and reject that poison?!
Counter Objection: Why can't everyone just accept God?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by coffee_addict, posted 03-01-2005 6:18 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by purpledawn, posted 03-02-2005 6:26 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 55 by nator, posted 03-02-2005 9:03 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 72 of 111 (189639)
03-02-2005 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by nator
03-02-2005 9:03 AM


Re: Pink Elephants have a small following
Schraf writes:
All you seem to be saying is that more people claim to have experienced God than claim to have experienced Pink Elephants.
Surely personal testimonies/recollections count for something. I know that here as in another thread eyewitness testimony has been downplayed but if you were in a hit and run and you had 100 people who all described the car that hit you, would that not count for something? Surely more than one guy who swore that a pink elephant bashed your car in and vanished in thin air!!
Likewise I not only have my testimony but the testimony of thousands who will swear to a lifechanging experience and will describe God in much the same way. Not because they have been taught or indoctorinated but because they share the passion of the encounter. It is a personal thing.
Furthermore, if 500 people testified that a pink elephant bashed your car in and then vanished in thin air, would not your impassive scientific mind give the evidence more consideration? Why is it human nature to always explain away things that make us uncomfortable?
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-02-2005 09:59 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by nator, posted 03-02-2005 9:03 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by MrHambre, posted 03-02-2005 3:45 PM Phat has not replied
 Message 75 by nator, posted 03-02-2005 6:38 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 76 of 111 (189695)
03-02-2005 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by nator
03-02-2005 6:38 PM


Re: Pink Elephants have a small following
Schraf writes:
I would think it would be the coolest thing in the world if there were pink elephants around, or God/gods for that matter.
So how do your beliefs and my beliefs differ?
A group of prominent church leaders and scholars ...drafted a clear, definitive statement of the essentials of the Gospel titled The Gospel of Jesus Christ: An Evangelical Celebration. Leaders from across the denominational landscape have endorsed it, and the list of names, already impressive, continues to grow. This remarkable show of unity affirms the core beliefs about our salvation that evangelicals hold in common. In the face of our differences, these are what bind us together as the church of Jesus Christ and make the Gospel the Good News of Great Joy.
I took the key points that I wish to address from this statement. I read the book and found that the beliefs which I have been taught and which I chose to embrace were in fact verified by many like minded people. These are not the swindling televangelists...these are respected (yes there are some!) leaders in Christian teaching. Some key points?
  • Nobody really seeks God. It is an observed trait that humans really don't wish to find a God who does not allow them to define and draft the terms of the relationship.
    Everybody wants a God of human verification and definition, but NOBODY wants a God who actually out thinks us in every capacity. Naturally there is never any evidence for such a God, for He is beyond quantification.

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 75 by nator, posted 03-02-2005 6:38 PM nator has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 84 by nator, posted 03-03-2005 9:50 AM Phat has not replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18350
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 103 of 111 (190149)
    03-05-2005 6:47 AM
    Reply to: Message 102 by Ooook!
    03-04-2005 6:20 PM


    Judging a Book without meeting the author
    Ooook writes:
    People may have had some kind of spiritual experience to set it all off, but the definition of what God is and what he condemns or condones comes from a written text like the Koran or the Bible, surely? What is a religious text if it isn't a device for communication in the physical world, and why can't I examine it and its' authenicity using similar principles?
    You certainly can critically examine the Bible, and study the communication contained within the pages. If you yourself have never had that little spiritual "experience' to set it off, however, you have not met the author of the passion and meaning behind the book.
    According to a believers perspective, anyway.
    BTW this does not make you ignorant or "out of da club" but it certainly may mean that the conclusions that you arrive at are different from your typical churchgoer.
    This leads us to determine whether our churchgoer has been enlightened or brainwashed.
    You have the advantage of examing the book from a detached and rational perspective.
    In conclusion, I believe that you and others as rational as you will view the book differently than I and others like me do.
    This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-05-2005 04:50 AM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 102 by Ooook!, posted 03-04-2005 6:20 PM Ooook! has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 104 by Ooook!, posted 03-05-2005 2:09 PM Phat has replied

      
    Phat
    Member
    Posts: 18350
    From: Denver,Colorado USA
    Joined: 12-30-2003
    Member Rating: 1.0


    Message 105 of 111 (190218)
    03-05-2005 2:15 PM
    Reply to: Message 104 by Ooook!
    03-05-2005 2:09 PM


    Ooooks Manifesto
    Good point, and something for ME to chew on for awhile. I'll get back to you in this thread perhaps...Forums are good places for Manifestos to be drafted.
    Ooook writes:
    One simply cannot use the tools of the physical world, (scientific method, etc) to prove the existence of the spiritual world. It’s disheartening to see believers try because they lose the argument every time. I'm sure that for most atheists, the discussion ends here. No physical evidence, then the conversation is pointless.
    Ideas are never pointless, and I'm sure that we can carry on a bit further before one of us loses interest. I'll get back to ya!
    This message has been edited by Phatboy, 03-05-2005 12:18 AM

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 104 by Ooook!, posted 03-05-2005 2:09 PM Ooook! has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 108 by Ooook!, posted 03-21-2005 12:51 PM Phat has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024