Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence is needed to change a creationist
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 121 of 144 (467984)
05-26-2008 5:36 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by Hawkins
05-26-2008 5:07 AM


Hawkins writes:
I just wanna brainstorming on that there's no rule contained inside the empty evolution by far scientifically speak than the level it should be treated.
Do you ever read what you have written? Does this gibberish make sense in your head?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Hawkins, posted 05-26-2008 5:07 AM Hawkins has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Hawkins, posted 05-26-2008 5:42 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 124 of 144 (467987)
05-26-2008 6:37 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by Hawkins
05-26-2008 5:42 AM


Hawkins writes:
BTW, it's not about whether animals actually evolve or not in reality, it's about whether the current scientific status is truly reflected.
Heres an idea, read a book on biology.
Hawkins writes:
They sound if it's already scientifically proven (while it's not) for the propagating of the hidden message that "there's no God".
You are quite, quite wrong, I fear.
You cannot scientifically prove anything (aside from in maths). So no, science does not claim this.
As for the message there is no god? If evolution is true, can one not conclude that this is how the xian god set the world up to work?
The only inference one can make about the implication of the truth of evolution and xianity is that it shows to a very high degree of certainty that the bible is allegorical rather than innerant.
By the way, I see by your location that you are in Hong Kong: if English is not your mother tongue I apologise for my initial comment on your sentance construction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Hawkins, posted 05-26-2008 5:42 AM Hawkins has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024