Simple, I was connecting the Bible's statement about no rain, no farmers and no domesticated plants with Scientists statement that in the fertile crescent and possibly all of the Middle East, there was a severe drought, that there was no farmers, and that there was no domesticated plants.
Why? Clearly the Bible is not refering to the Younger Dryas event.
It's refering to a legendary time.
Hell, why start at the Younger Dryas and a debate about aggriculture? Let's start 50 million years ago. Clearly the Bible is right that 50 MILLION years ago there were no farmers and no domesticated plants.
Then, at the mountain that fits the Biblical description of the location of the Garden
"Eden" was taken from the Sumerian "edin" meaning steppes or plains. There would be no mountain. Clearly the Bible is incorrect.
I have no problem with creation over millions of years. I rather like the punctuated evolution model, first proposed by Stephen Jay Gould. The moments of dramatic change might be correlated with some creative act of God.
Except that they aren't. That sort of a statement is nothing more than fantasy.
You might as well say that the events of the Civil War correlate to the temperment of Thor.
There's no evidence to support the existance of, let alone actions of, any sort of magical wizard, Jewish or otherwise.
Co-opting Gould's work for your own purposes is dishonest.