|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Reciprocal Prayer - For Mike and Buz | |||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
quote: But when judging the supernatural experiences of others, you're judging on the basis of yourself when in fact you're unable to determine that of another on the basis of your own lack of such knowledge or experience in regards to the supernatural. I believe you and I have far different patterns and experiences in the realm of the supernatural, especially in regard to prayer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Zealot Inactive Member |
But I did pray in his name. Most would take offense at your presumption to know otherwise.
Appologies, essentially my statement was just that if you pray in Jesus's name to the Father, you would be assured anything you experience would be from Him. There seemed confusing regarding whether it couldn't be some other spririt influencing you.
I say with complete certainty that I prayed selflessly and honestly in Christ's name for many years. I took many a step in faith and found the results no more rewarding than random chances.
But isn't that what its all about ? You could either see acts as random or of importance. You essentially believed that prayed had no effect.
I've never even known anybody with a story that required a supernatural explanation. I've heard lots of stories where people prayed for things and they happened, but they were results with a finite probability of occurring anyway.
But any experiences can be brought down to random probability. The scheptic will always doubdt, the faithfull will always believe.
My faith in Christ was about the only thing that mattered to me, and my loss thereof was devastating for a time. You have no clue how devoted I was....
I can well believe Zephyr. Not to sound belittleing, but there are many devoted Jews, Muslems, Hindu's. I can even find Christian churches where they have very devoted believers, but their message is very different from another Christian church. That God does not show himself to Liberal Churches for instance, surprises me little. That God will not show himself to a church, who's pastor has relations with members of the congregation, also doesn't surprise me. Remember, many will cry 'Lord, lord', but will not be saved. Not insinuating that was your church, but just something to think about.
What kind of experience are you talking about? I can't speculate how I would respond, let alone how others would react, without an example. The still small voice (which it seems is an invention of the mind) is one thing. How about the voice actually giving me information I could not have known, but later verified? How about a hand writing on the wall? A chariot in the sky? I might respond differently to each of these things. The thing is, the only one I have heard is the supposed voice answering my questions, and in every case the voice said things that fit within my preexisting knowledge of scripture and the way I had been taught to interpret it.
I hear what you are saying. Personally , I refused to 'talk in tongues' or 'believe so hard in God that I could manifest Him', or anything I believe was my own doing. In many ways I could be considered a sceptic Christian, well atleast sceptic of churches. I have also gone to the front of a church and the pastor said 'May the Holy Spirit enter your body etc'. While completely welcoming God's spirit, I couldn't make myself believe anything that wasn't there. But that is not why we are Christians. Lemme put it this way. You have lost your faith. You choose not to believe in Christ because when you completely believed in Him, it seems He did not show you miracles. But your faith it seems was based on 'deeds' of God, not his Word. Because if He did allow you to prophesize or give you some 'supernatural' sign EG: writing on wall, you would still be a Christian. Do you not think the fact that you would lose faith , if he didn't perform any of these 'acts', could be the reason He didn't perform any of these acts ? Firstly I dont see God providing you with any 'acts' you would be able to prove to anyone else. Just my opinion. Secondly if you did experience any of these 'signs', lets say.. a clear dream/vision , would anyone believe you ? Everyone would tell you that its all in your mind surely. Afterall people that do claim to experience visions are often in a padded cell.
I have a near-photographic memory back to about age 3. You're asking the wrong guy about the fallibility of his recall. The decline and fall of my faith was a drawn-out and painful experience, which I remember in great detail. In the course of it, I invoked every possible incident of his intervention in my life, in order to convince myself that it was real. But I was wrong.
I dont doubdt that you wouldn't remember any experiences with God, just that as time goes by, it seems easy to convince ourselves about what could have happened, didn't happen. A patient in hospital could see Jesus, have a conversation with Him, but 5 years after his recovery, with everyone telling him that it must have been medication, it is often difficult to keep believing. Even Jesus's desciple's struggled to believe Jesus could rise from the grave.
Not that it matters, but no. It means he would have given me one more reason to believe. I think it's ludicrous to suggest, as some do, that the less reason you have for believing (and therefore the greater faith) the more you will be rewarded for doing so anyway. By that rationale, I should pick the most ridiculous beliefs possible to elevate my own virtue.
I dont agree with 'less reason to believe'. I do agree with 'greater belief' = greater rewards, however this is just my own opinion. I have known some moderate Christian's that have had very strong experiences that have litterally changed their lives overnight, and I've known some Christians that have spent a great deal of time worshipping, but yet to experience anything similar. Either way, my own opinion is that God tends not to 'bolster' someone's belief based on deeds. Atleast not too often.
In the past, I would have said "yes," both because I'm an unrepentant smartass and because both were true. That means I considered both a valid basis for faith - after all, even if one is expected to believe without seeing miracles, the miracle of the resurrection was central to Christianity, and the Twelve were convinced by both miracles and Jesus' person.
Christ was required to perform miracles. Claiming to be the Messiah is not an easy job. In just the same way early Christians HAD to have had strong influences from the Holy Spirit to endure the persecution. If you go by the assumption that today we live in a completely amoral society and that we should adhere much more stringently to God's laws and commandments, would it still surprise you that God does not show Himself more freely ? Just that I cant see God making a prophet out of a 'devout' Christian believing Christ died for his sins and thus its ok to have pre marital sex ect... Not saying you're like that at all, just trying to see if you agree that there are many "Christians" that God just couldn't show Himself to. cheers z
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Zealot Inactive Member |
2. Also there' no guarantee at all that after one's prayer in Jesus's name is going to mean subsequent experiences are from God, especially if the experience is inconsistent with Biblical criteria as to the nature of that experience.
You suggesting that should someone say a prayer in Christ's name , that during that prayer a bad influence could intervene or are you talking 'at a later date' ? Z
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
I was under the impression that the purpose of this topic was to explore prayer and prayer like activities of members other than those of the creation side. Might we turn the focus back in that direction?
Adminnemooseus ------------------Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to Change in Moderation? or too fast closure of threads
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Zealot Inactive Member |
I was under the impression that the purpose of this topic was to explore prayer and prayer like activities of members other than those of the creation side. Might we turn the focus back in that direction?
"I'd be interested to hear the specifics of both Mike and Buz's experiences with God-communication, and whether or not the experience was similar to my own. " I think that Dan specified general experiences whilst praying. Either way Zephyr, if you're up for discussion off the forums in private, let me know, otherwise if you'd like to create a seperate thread, that would be fine too. cheers Z
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2201 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: No, I'm not. I'm judging on the basis of the story you told yourself, combined with what I know about the very well-understood psychological phenomena of confirmation bias.
quote: I don't have to have knowledge of the supernatural in this case. You presented several stories as examples of God intervening in your life in response to prayer. I pointed out that your claims could represent the common human thought error known as "confirmation bias" in which people notice and remember that which confirms their belief and ignore, disregard, and forget that which disconfirms their belief. For instance, why didn't you consider the fact that your truck was having mechanical problems in the first place as evidence that God was not answering your prayers? Why didn't you consider the fact that God brought the woman you were seeing into your life and allowed you to become involved with her, even though she would eventually break up with you as evidence that God was not answering prayers? See? You tend to only consider confirming evidence because that's what you want to be true. It is also simply easier for us humans, cognitively, to think this way. Despite it being unnatural, it is vital to account for confirmation bias if one really wants to come as close to realuity as possible, particularly when dealing with historical events and causation.
quote: Do you believe that you are somehow immune to confirmation bias? Do you believe that it is somehow impossible that you may have ever fallen victim to the bias of ignoring or not noticing evidence that may disconfirm your existing preferred belief?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
zephyr Member (Idle past 4581 days) Posts: 821 From: FOB Taji, Iraq Joined: |
quote: quote:I was the faithful, and I persisted in belief through many disappointments (but also many perceived positive answers and growth in faith). So you can't say I had predetermined that I would be a skeptic. I genuinely believed, long after I had lost the will to follow. That was the worst time of all. Besides, if you think it all comes down to our inherent faith or doubt, there's not much left to discuss.quote:If this is true, then I am one of those people. I don't believe it, but it is literally the only way my life experience could possibly fit into the worldview in which I was raised. Again this eliminates any discussion. In the period to which I refer above, I often read the verses toward the end of Hebrews where Paul talks about losing salvation. It's pretty cut and dried. This really is irrelevant because I have no interest whatsoever in regaining the faith I lost, and have difficulty even taking it seriously now. I see it as a possible benefit to others but a loss for me. I have chalked it up and moved on.quote: quote:Maybe I didn't explain very well. I would have been happy if the only thing I ever received from God was a genuine sense of peace and comfort. I would not demand miracles - I was taught well not to, and I knew plenty of great believers who also did not require them. The question of who would believe a theoretical experience (which I expect to never have) is not something I care to pursue now. A lot of bridges are best crossed when you come to them. Finally, a bit of an aside:quote:No. God is omnipotent as described in the Bible. He can reveal himself in a dramatic vision to a totally unbelieving mass murderer and make him the greatest evangelist to ever live. What makes you think that a few profanities or lustful thoughts can somehow deprive an all-powerful creator of his ability to communicate with a creation over which he holds complete sway? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I think for the moment I'm perfectly happy keeping the discussion public.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2201 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
bump
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Zealot Inactive Member |
Sorry you feel that way Zephyr. I really do feel for you.
No. God is omnipotent as described in the Bible. He can reveal himself in a dramatic vision to a totally unbelieving mass murderer and make him the greatest evangelist to ever live. What makes you think that a few profanities or lustful thoughts can somehow deprive an all-powerful creator of his ability to communicate with a creation over which he holds complete sway?
Yes God can do that, but do you think He will, especially to a church where they are not focussing 100% on Him, but more on building God around their belief ? If you read Lev, you will see that God showed himself only to people that were 100% clean. If you were unclean, no luck, indeed if you entered the temple unclean , you would be killed. I have heard many stories about drug addicts that found God, all in one random incident, but my personal view is that we need to be much closer to God's Will to see Him. I cant see God's spirit in a church that opposes his Will. The most devout Christian I know, is a close friend of mine, but even he seems to bend his faith around what he wants to believe. Either way, stay well. Z
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024