Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   That certain kind of Christian
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 45 of 62 (445560)
01-02-2008 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by macaroniandcheese
01-02-2008 2:54 PM


brennakimi writes:
quote:
what exactly does gay marriage have to do with the economy?
Well, it means about a quarter of a billion dollars to California. If same-sex couples got married at the same rate that they entered civil union in Vermont, the state of California would save about $250 billion in expenditures due to the fact that the citizenry would be considered joint rather than single.
So if one is truly concerned about the economy, then one is in favor of equality in marriage.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-02-2008 2:54 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 47 of 62 (445563)
01-02-2008 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Taz
01-02-2008 3:21 PM


Taz writes:
quote:
When was the last time you heard about a christian rally for gay rights?
Soulforce, led by the Reverend Mel White...ghost writer to Billy Graham, Jerry Falwell, D. James Kennedy, Ollie North, and Pat Robertson.
Rev. Dr. White is gay and got tired of the bigotry he was shilling for.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Taz, posted 01-02-2008 3:21 PM Taz has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 48 of 62 (445567)
01-02-2008 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Phat
01-02-2008 3:51 PM


Re: Tolerance
Phat writes:
quote:
Should Jesus have been tolerant of Pharisees?
If he had had the courage of his convictions, yes.
Or does "turn the other cheek" have an exception?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Phat, posted 01-02-2008 3:51 PM Phat has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 50 of 62 (445569)
01-02-2008 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Buzsaw
01-02-2008 6:13 PM


Buzsaw writes:
quote:
Was loving Jesus being hateful when he warned of Hell and the likelyhood that many will go there?
Yes, for as Jesus said, "Judge not, that ye be not judged." No, that is not a claim that if you aren't guilty of what you are judging others for, you're safe. Everybody seems to forget that Matthew 7 continues on:
Matthew 7:2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.
The moment Jesus said people risked hell, he condemned himself there.
It is not for you to say, Buzsaw, anything about hell for you have no power over it, no control over god, and absolutely no comprehension of god's motives.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Buzsaw, posted 01-02-2008 6:13 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 52 of 62 (445572)
01-02-2008 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Buzsaw
01-02-2008 9:56 PM


Buzsaw writes:
quote:
3. If he's really king/majesty/almighty who are we to oppose him. We loose if we do.
BZZZZT!
Pascal's Wager! I'm so sorry, Buzsaw. Johnny, tell him what parting gifts he has!
Well, Bob, Buzsaw has won himself a lifetime of anguish in someone else's hell! Yes, that's right. After spending all of his life fighting against Satan and worshipping the Christian god, Buzsaw gets a reward of going straight to Hades for his hubris. He'll be sentenced to solve a series of puzzles for which the instructions can be read in many ways. Every attempt to glean more information will be met with "Since it would just be a waste of my time to tell you, I won't." Of course, every proposed solution will conflict with something in the contradictory instructions. This being for his continued insistence that those around him are unworthy of explanations.
But, he won't get hungry because he'll have an afterlife-time supply of Rice-a-Roni®, the San Francisco Treat.
You didn't really think that the god that truly exists is the Christian one, did you?
quote:
We are to do to others as we would have them do to us.
And that means not judging. The moment you do, you condemn yourself to the same fate. The moment you declare that someone else risks hell, you condemn yourself there.
How can you remove the mote in your brother's eye when there is this great plank in your own?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Buzsaw, posted 01-02-2008 9:56 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Buzsaw, posted 01-03-2008 9:11 AM Rrhain has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 53 of 62 (445573)
01-02-2008 10:54 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Buzsaw
01-02-2008 10:34 PM


Buzsaw writes:
quote:
If you reject, you get the condemnation from God in that you have rejected his kingdom, his rules, his way.
BZZZZT!
Pascal's Wager! I'm so sorry, Buzsaw. Johnny, tell him what parting gifts he has!
Well, Bob, Buzsaw has won himself a lifetime of anguish in someone else's hell! Yes, that's right. After spending all of his life fighting against Satan and worshipping the Christian god, Buzsaw gets a reward of going straight to Hades for his hubris. He'll be sentenced to solve a series of puzzles for which the instructions can be read in many ways. Every attempt to glean more information will be met with "Since it would just be a waste of my time to tell you, I won't." Of course, every proposed solution will conflict with something in the contradictory instructions. This being for his continued insistence that those around him are unworthy of explanations.
But, he won't get hungry because he'll have an afterlife-time supply of Rice-a-Roni®, the San Francisco Treat.
You didn't really think that the god that truly exists is the Christian one, did you?

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Buzsaw, posted 01-02-2008 10:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024