Essentially people cannot distinguish art done with creative intelligent intent from that done rather randomly.
Then how can people distinguish things such as flowers, animals, and galaxies produced through creative intent from random activity.
Based on the logic of probability, a toddler could eventually splatter out a Mona Lisa given enough paint, time, and the impossible situation of remaining a patient toddler for umpteen billion years.
Great spans of time produce random selection. Odd how we can critically speculate and muse about such subjects so purposefully and intelligently.
I think this is called "backfiring". Or has Phatboy been "pissing into the wind"?
Although it is windier than I would have liked, I must remind you that we are not concluding either side as correct are we? I could just as well say that one day, Richard Dawkins will bow to the one whom he mocked.
While I disagree with you often, I respect that you have intelligence. Can't C.S. Lewis be given some measure of respect as well?