Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Western Philosophy and cracks...
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 24 (29895)
01-22-2003 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by caligula
01-22-2003 11:03 AM


Philosophy is a hard thing these days, it's almost impossible to get past semantics. There is plenty of real philosophy going on in the west it's just that it's being done by artists and musicians, in the comforts of coffe shops.
------------------
Saved by an incredible Grace.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by caligula, posted 01-22-2003 11:03 AM caligula has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by John, posted 01-22-2003 1:36 PM funkmasterfreaky has replied

  
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 24 (30195)
01-25-2003 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by John
01-22-2003 1:36 PM


Thought and language are fluid and more like metaphor and poetry.
This is why people with artistic minds are the better philosophers. Unfortunately it takes like minded people to see what they are getting at. If you take analytical thinking too far you ruin the whole idea of philosophy. This is where the semantic games come in. I find that metaphor is a more effective way of expressing an idea than a mathematical equation. Although I guess that depends on who you are trying to express your idea to. If you are trying to convey an idea to a mathematical mind then I am quite wrong in saying metaphors are more accurate. However if I am discussing an idea with a creative mind then I could not be more right.
Language can be used effectively, as long as we look at what the speaker intended to say instead of looking into what we wanted them to mean.
I think I just confused myself.
------------------
Saved by an incredible Grace.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by John, posted 01-22-2003 1:36 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by John, posted 01-30-2003 10:53 AM funkmasterfreaky has replied
 Message 16 by nator, posted 03-21-2003 8:45 AM funkmasterfreaky has not replied

  
funkmasterfreaky
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 24 (31057)
02-02-2003 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by John
01-30-2003 10:53 AM


After I started to think about why artistic minds are better philosophers, I realized that they are just the ones that I understand the best. Probably because they think similarily to me.
I guess I don't have specific examples of "great" artist/musician philosophers. I just find from talking to these sorts of people that they are less restricted in this area because of the loose creative aproach.
As far as my comment on analytical thinking, I more meant critical thinking. I've noticed that critical thinkers lack that ability to look at what a speaker is intending to convey.
To me philosophy is a looser thing, more like art or music than science or math. If you get too hung up on nit-picking details, you ruin the process of philosophy.
The semantic games, that frequently ruin philosophical discussion can be easily avoided by looking at the speakers intended meaning, instead of jumping to conclusions based on your own presuppositions.
Not really sure what I just said or if it has any substance.
------------------
Saved by an incredible Grace.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by John, posted 01-30-2003 10:53 AM John has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024