I thought I was a herpetologist working on the kinematics of biological change but lack of engineers to do some form of desgin of Simon Levin's "ecosystem" changed that back to my sole preoccupation of figuring out what kind of machine could extract energy from forms' (evoluionist's "bauplan" no matter the time involved) rigidity-stability. The rise of EVOLUTIONARY Discource against Creationism (take a date from the Cornell Prof who went to Europe on vacation to write a response to the newly emerged existence of ICR and CRS using knoweldge in genetics if you need one that is just as close to my birth date etc) has inhibited the ability of biologists to focus on the constancy in the change and rather than tokenize any difference of creation (c) and evolution (e) I find the polarization but not the polarity a detraction to furthering my goal of utilitzing molecular science to gain say historical differences in the interpretation of electricity. I do however find the creationist criticism of evolution telling as to how it was that I could not find biologists ABLE to strech the three disciplines (Biology, Chemistry, and Phyiscs) necessary to carry out the task to benefit humanity so instead being isolated I often revert not to the parent form but instead to some notion I deried from UNDERSTANDING both Pascal and Galelio and try to imagine how ecosystem engineering could be possible and begin to provide a way to alter agriculture (instead ofthe science of energy transduction) into biomass productivity to garnish sustainablity indeed. We do not know how much time THIS will take which really does make it MORE difficult for an evoultionist (say my Grandfather who has passed but not even John Edwards could see that when he was in Jamestown) to tell how long it took New York State to go from let us suppose an aquatic habit to a brackish habitat to a thousands islands in a sea of people. New Jersey IS NOT New York. And there were differences there as well.
I did all of this work just by supposing* that evolution occured over a long time period but creationists were correct to assert that one may not *suppose this higher education (which was good enough for public k-12) and IS ALL THE LAW REQUIRES but that one had to take it on even at a private school where the motto is to let the student study anything, there is an explict program to be a scholar of such, and one of the founders of the place to learn "higher" wrote a historically important paper in the area of science and religion. Go figure why the Riddler is not the Penguin. The Gothic Building is all there ever was.
™ Version 4.2