The following was quoted by Loudmouth:
quote:
In the early afternoon of August 24, 79 CE, Mt Vesuvius erupted violently, sending hot ash flows speeding down its flanks. These flows buried and destroyed Pompeii and other nearby Roman cities. We know the exact day of this eruption because Pliny the Younger carefully recorded the event. In 1997 a team of scientists from the Berkeley Geochronology Center and the University of Naples decided to see if the 40Ar/39Ar method of radiometric dating could accurately measure the age of this very young (by geological standards) volcanic material. They separated sanidine crystals from a sample of one of the ash flows. Incremental heating experiments on 12 samples of sanidine yielded 46 data points that resulted in an isochron age of 1925 94 years. The actual age of the flow in 1997 was 1918 years. Is this just a coincidence? No it is the result of extremely careful analyses using a technique that works.
One might point out that Ar-Ar uses a standard of known age to calibrate the age. I am not sure how old the standard in this example used, but I can say that is is
far older than ten-thousand years. The only way that Ar-Ar could have gotten that date correct is for the Earth to be far older than ten-thousand years old unless one thinks it was an incredibly unlikely coincidence or that geologist just like to make stuff up.
I do my best to dump jellybeans on the creationists' parade.
™ Version 4.2