Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potassium Argon Dating doesnt work at all
wj
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 133 (40845)
05-21-2003 2:01 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by Kyle Shockley
05-20-2003 11:05 PM


Re: Superpositioning
Kyle
Please give an example of where radiometric dating is used to directly measure the age of a sedimentary rock. Your linked article by creationist Berthault is irrelevent to radiometric dating.
I note that you rely on 20+ year old citations. This is very suspicious. Are we to believe that these apparent contradictions to conventional science have been ignored, not researched or not explained in the last 20 years? Are you implying that your quotations are the last word on the respective issues?
Is there any evidence for a 6,000 year old earth (or whatever age your theological beliefs force you to support)?
How does your alternative paradigm explain the consistency of radiometric dating, examples of which are provided here and here? Or the ability of K/Ar dating to reconcile with the historical eruption of Mt Vesuvius mentioned here? And does your alternative paradigm cope with the fact that the supernova 1987A measurements demonstrate that the Large Magellanic Cloud is 168,000 light years away and therefore the universe must be at least 168,000 years old?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Kyle Shockley, posted 05-20-2003 11:05 PM Kyle Shockley has not replied

  
wj
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 133 (41316)
05-25-2003 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Kyle Shockley
05-25-2003 4:35 AM


Kyle
Your response at message #55 seems to bear no relationship to my message #51 which it is supposedly responding to. Perhaps you could read me message again and address at least some of the questions I raised.
BTW, your link now seems to be dead.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Kyle Shockley, posted 05-25-2003 4:35 AM Kyle Shockley has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Kyle Shockley, posted 05-25-2003 9:27 PM wj has replied

  
wj
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 133 (41327)
05-25-2003 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Kyle Shockley
05-25-2003 9:27 PM


Kyle
Again you have apparently responded to me but there seems to be no logical connection between my questions and your "answers". Are you having problems with how this board works?
Try rereading my message #51 and giving a coherent response.
If you followed the links in my message you would have an abundance of references which the article authors have used.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Kyle Shockley, posted 05-25-2003 9:27 PM Kyle Shockley has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024