Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there evidence that dating methods MUST be invalid?
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 38 of 50 (115937)
06-17-2004 12:40 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by jar
06-16-2004 1:59 PM


Re: To all trying to discuss with Almeyda
jar
Jeez how can someone go through life never having looked through a telescope or binoculars and at least not wonder at the distances involved.Has almeyda never had the opportunity to test parallax and study such things as spectral analysis? I shudder to think at the loss of understanding that never investigating the world through science must entail. Pity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 06-16-2004 1:59 PM jar has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5939 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 45 of 50 (124852)
07-15-2004 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by johnfolton
07-15-2004 9:30 AM


Re: Dating Methods confirm the biblical standards true, etc...
whatever
earth, so we have a problem wherein the rocks themselves might date old, and the fossils buried within the rock sediments would need be young
Would you care to explain how the fossilization of bone throigh the replacement by minerals that form a cast replica to replace the original bone came to be in the Genesis creation event somewhere between 6,000 to 11,250 years ago?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by johnfolton, posted 07-15-2004 9:30 AM johnfolton has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024