Open Challenge: Evidence of a Young Earth

Mike,Things get rapidly buried today, hardly an observation that warrants a global flood inference.However, you still have to respond to this, which was originally pointed out to you in your "millions of years" thread.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.[This message has been edited by mark24, 08-08-2003]

Mr Nicholson,The sun pulsates, measure this change during the contraction part & you could infer this. But to infer this now would mean ignoring the fact that it becomes larger, too.http://www.asa3.org/...ronomy-Cosmology/PSCF9-86VanTill.html"Within the professional scientific community, a preliminary report which suggested a long-term and rapid shrinkage of the sun presented a puzzle for solar astronomers. Consequently, additional studies were made and the credibility of the original data was re-evaluated. The result is that secular shrinkage has not been substantiated, but an 80-year oscillatory behavior was discovered."What creationist ministry of misinformation did you get that from?Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.[This message has been edited by mark24, 08-08-2003]