So if evolution is true it went in the opposite direction.
There is no 'direction' in evolution. Think blind cave fish. (
Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus)
So the evidence is very obvious that Australopithicus and Homo-Erectus must have co-existed since Homo-Erectus footprints are found in the same geologic layer as lucy.Which falsifies the theory of evolution
Why would Homo-Erectus and Australopithicus co-existing bring any problems whatsoever to the Theory of Evolution? Nothing says that a population has to be extinct for its
evoloved sub population to exist. If this was the way scientists proposed that evolution works then why didn't they notice the error when
all fish did not go extinct when the blind cave fish evoloved?