Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   December 2006 Post Of The Month Nominations
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 25 of 28 (375129)
01-07-2007 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by AdminNem
01-05-2007 6:56 PM


Re: December's Winners
AdminNem writes:
Congratulations!
This should make for some interesting reading for you, NJ.
http://EvC Forum: The people behind a great post... -->EvC Forum: The people behind a great post...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by AdminNem, posted 01-05-2007 6:56 PM AdminNem has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by iano, posted 01-07-2007 9:32 PM iano has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 26 of 28 (375203)
01-07-2007 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by iano
01-07-2007 3:22 PM


Re: December's Winners
Although the personnel might have changed the results are rather indicative. A variety of posters got an initial PotM nominaton on the basis of a post arguing "against" the positon of these people below. The most "PotM'd against" person was Faith at 15, me next...etc
Faith 15*
Iano 10*
Randman 9*
Buzsaw 5*
Jar 4
Riverrat 3*
Jaywill 2*
Nwr 2
Phat 2
Golfer 2
Percy 2
The asterix denotes a person who holds a "faith alone" position. The number beside their name indicates the number of "first" nominations for posts arguing against their position. In fact, 45% of all* PotM's argued against these people (*seconds/thirds not counted - if counted then even more argued against "faith alone" by way of nominations).
This says nothing very much except that a single position dominated the position PotM writers happened to be arguing "against" - over all the other positions at EvC.
It is interesting to note that Randman is consigned to the Showhouse. Faith has been banned. I don't post because I would hold the same line Faith would. Thus, the "top three" of the above list have been, by way of force of one kind or another, removed from the scene that was then. Buzsaw, who posts very little on-thread, attracted an abnormally high amount of PotMs against, funnily enough. But it sounds like he had history here - so I could have been catching the tail-end of things.
Another bit of interesting data:
Total (1st) PotM nominations in 2005 = 215
Nominations for Faith Alone adherents = 7.2
For 7.2 read 7. Despite the PotM's "against" faith alone positions representing 45% of all initial nominations, nominations "for" faith alone positions only counted for 7 out of 215...less than 4%. "Brilliant argument vs.imbecilic argument" (to paraphrase) was a common (anti-Faith Alone position) explanation for the wild discrepency
Read it as you will NJ. The figures seem to indicate a "massive force" against a position you seem to hold yourself. By all means argue the toss. But when it comes to "building up" an institution like PotM it is worth threading carefully. Partisan and anti-Christian it has proven to be. Handing out "prizes" as you do is only playing into hands. Its an arrogance as it is. Stay well clear and give it no truck is my advice.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by iano, posted 01-07-2007 3:22 PM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by arachnophilia, posted 01-08-2007 1:12 AM iano has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024