April, 2004, Posts of the Month

Name: Mark24 (and also Parsimonious_Razor, for starting the topic)
Forum: Evolution
Thread: Rate changes for evolution
Post #: 29Message 29 is pretty good, but the topic as a whole has been some of the best "Punk Eek" discussion I've seen.Mooseps to NosyNed - You need to fix the previous message

Name: Bill Birkeland
Forum: Geology and the Great Flood
Thread: Wyatt's Museum and the shape of Noah's Ark
Post #: 14In reference to the "Ark shaped" geological features of Mt. Ararat. NosyNed says in the following message:

quote:

---

I think Bill has answered the questions we might have had.

---

Moose

Name: Desdamona
Forum: Big Bang and Cosmology
Thread: Big Bang Problem
Post #: 91Contains the following:

quote:

---

If the Holy Bible doesn't have any credibility over someone's favorite science teachers, what does?

---

{Adminnemooseus injects side note: Note the "wonderful" topic title. Message 1 was actually pretty good, containing the key sentence "How can we explain how The Big Bang Theory contradicts the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum". Title should have been "Big Bang - Contradicts the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum?". AM exits.}Remember all, this forum is NOT the place to debate the cited topic.Moose

---

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham

Name: Loudmouth
Forum: Is It Science?
Thread: Open Minded? {Topic title change pending}
Post #: 17A concise summary of the scientific method. Strangely enough, this came out of a discussion of changing the topic title to something more discriptive.1 sentence from the message:

quote:

---

Finding data that doesn't fit the model is kind of the Holy Grail amongst scientists, it guarentees a long and fruitful career and maybe even a new theory named after themself.

---

Moose