Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Post of the Month ⇒

March, 2005, Posts of the Month

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   March, 2005, Posts of the Month
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 18 of 36 (192808)
03-20-2005 1:56 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Adminnemooseus
03-01-2005 12:14 AM

Percy at "Is Evolutionist Disparagement of Creationism Justified?"
Name: Percy
Forum:Is it Science?
Thread:Is Evolutionist Disparagement of Creationism Justified?
Post: 54
​
Percy, yet again, lays out an extremely clear, well-written analysis of a particular poster's argument flaws while couching it in a wider view of the Creo/Evo debate.
​
{Made the "54" a clickable link. Also added the subtitle - Adminnemooseus}
​
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 03-21-2005 03:15 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-01-2005 12:14 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by JonF, posted 03-24-2005 9:50 AM nator has not replied
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 20 of 36 (193006)
03-21-2005 8:49 AM 		Reply to: Message 19 by Silent H
03-21-2005 5:44 AM

Re: Faith at "Is Evolutionist Disparagement of Creationism Justified?"
quote:
I want to back up Buz's nomination in that I think Faith is at the very least being extremely articulate. Very good writing style.
​
I agree 100%. Faith is an excellent writer and is very articulate.
​
quote:
I would love to see Faith make it more into specific science threads in order to deal with factual issues.
​
I think this is very, very unlikely to happen anytime soon.
​
Did you see the fit Faith pitched in that thread because someone didn't let her/him weasel out of being accountable for what they actually wrote?
​
I would like to think that Faith will eventually be able to handle the minute scrutiny and dissection that goes on in the science threads, but I have some serious doubts.
​
I don't think Faith particularly likes being rigorous and precise when examining his/her own ideas and claims. In fact, I think Faith avoids it like the plague.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Silent H, posted 03-21-2005 5:44 AM Silent H has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Silent H, posted 03-21-2005 9:45 AM nator has not replied
 Message 23 by pink sasquatch, posted 03-21-2005 7:25 PM nator has replied
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 24 of 36 (193325)
03-22-2005 10:26 AM 		Reply to: Message 23 by pink sasquatch
03-21-2005 7:25 PM

Re: schraf defends science
thanks Pink!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by pink sasquatch, posted 03-21-2005 7:25 PM pink sasquatch has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024