It is interesting that no doctorate scientists believes the scientific evidences support evolution enough to debate Walt, on his challenge, does the scientific evidence support creationism or evolution
Only a few doctorate scientists are willing to debate Walt because:
1. Debates don't matter except to the great unwashed. Debates do not decide truth.
2. Debating crackpots like Walt is a waste of time that could better be spent doing useful things.
3. There's no sicentific basis on which to debate Walt, all he's got is theology ... he refuses to debate on what he's got.
This is, of course, terrifically off topic. Walt Brown has nothing to do with intelligent design, or intelligence, or design.
™ Version 4.2