YEC ideas about radioactive decay would require rewriting fundamental physics.
The two main scientific problems are:
1) There's NO known method of significantly accelerating radioactive decay under the conditions that would apply.
2) ALL the relevant radioactive decay modes would have to change proportionally to account for the data. Even fiddling with fundamental constants wouldn't be likely to do it (if it's even possible, such a change would have to be "fine tuned")
In terms of everyday science, scientists simply wouldn't go for this. The idea would - quite rightly - be generally ignored. Throwing out a working theory in favour of speculative ideas which only create problems isn't done and shouldn't be done.
So what you seem to be actually asking for is some sort of "Theology Police" to force scientists to stick to YEC-approved hypothesis, to suppress evidence that causes problems for YEC and to generally force scientists to toe the theological line.
And that really would be a major change. One of the strengths of science is that it is not forced to hold to one sectarian line. Scientists can and do disagree, but the scientific method provides a far better way of resolving such disputes.
YEC had it's chance and lost on the scientific merits of its case. The only way to change that is to fundamentally change how science is done.