I saw you quote mine me, so I figured I should step in. Yes I did say that the grand canyon itself can have many different interpretations of formation. I'm not sure how many logical interpretations it could have, but for argument's sake lets say 1 million.
Now you take my statement at that, and then use it to bolster your case that one of those 1 million could in fact be the case. But that is self-delusion and taking my statement way out of context.
I could just as easily have said a single tree could allow for a zillion different scenarios for how the niverse came about. The point is one tree, just as one canyon, is NOT ENOUGH ON WHICH TO BASE A THEORY REGARDING THE FORMATION OF GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES.
Remember I was directly stating that you should pull your head out of your precious canyon and start looking at other evidence. It is other geology that you ALSO have to explain which starts whittling down those other million interpretations. Some completely destroy your YE scenario.
Keeping your head stuck in your Bible and that single canyon is as good as having done nothing at all. It is willful ignorance of the highest order.
holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)
™ Version 4.2
