A fraudulant Dating "test"
What occured here acording to the above site is that Ausin choose samples in a many which is understood to produce a date that is
not that of a lava flow and then claimed it dated the lava flow. Since the date obtained was "too old" he claimed this invalidated the method.
Since what is needed to use the method properly was already well understood there is not excuse for this. I submit this as an example of the kind of dishonesty that creation "scientists" get up to. (or is that down to? )
Zac, you wanted to play. Still want to?