Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 10 of 283 (102497)
04-24-2004 10:45 PM 		Reply to: Message 9 by Monsieur_Lynx
04-24-2004 10:38 PM

Hi, ML. You might want to read
EvC Forum: Style Guides for EvC
for some tips on how to be read more easily around here.
​
And read up on slime molds. They're unicellular some of the time, and multicellular and cooperative at other times.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Monsieur_Lynx, posted 04-24-2004 10:38 PM Monsieur_Lynx has not replied
  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 135 of 283 (157463)
11-08-2004 10:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 130 by winston123180
11-08-2004 10:02 PM

The only possibility is that God created the Angler fish with all the fully-functional equipment it needed to survive at great depths.
Nope. Maui might have created it. Or aliens. Or Neptune/Poseidon. Or it might even have evolved through pathways that this imagination-impaired author didn't think of and/or didn't read up on.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by winston123180, posted 11-08-2004 10:02 PM winston123180 has not replied
  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 140 of 283 (157470)
11-08-2004 10:24 PM 		Reply to: Message 130 by winston123180
11-08-2004 10:02 PM

(Research scientists have broken down Luciferase into more than 1,000 proteins, but they still do not know how the heatless light is produced. Someone someday may figure out how God made this heatless light. Need I say that they will join the ranks of the righ and famous?)
When I did a proposition oral on chemiluminescence 31 years ago, it was pretty durn well understood - though I'd have to go back to the library to give you the precise details on how this light is produced. Many luciferins involve breaking of a dioxetane ring and subsequent singlet -> triplet conversion of the radicals formed.
And that "1000 proteins" bit is complete nonsense! There are lots of different luciferases, and the biggest I know of is a single protein. Many are small molecules.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by winston123180, posted 11-08-2004 10:02 PM winston123180 has not replied
  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 231 of 283 (333402)
07-19-2006 3:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 230 by smegma
07-19-2006 3:19 PM

Hi, smegma! That's a very interesting screen name, particularly for a Harun Yahya fan such as you appear to be. Welcome to EvC!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by smegma, posted 07-19-2006 3:19 PM smegma has not replied
  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 765 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002

Normal Thread Display
Message 236 of 283 (333542)
07-19-2006 8:55 PM 		Reply to: Message 235 by smegma
07-19-2006 8:48 PM

Re: back up.
damn!how bias is that lol.i'm done debating here.
​
Is that a new record? Two hours, maybe?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by smegma, posted 07-19-2006 8:48 PM smegma has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024