Creationism/ID as Science

In my mind (this is an opinion only) ID is not a science. This is because ID relies upon inferences and holes in evolutionary science as the tiers of its foundation. The concept of something being too complex to be thought of as being able to evolve to me proves nothing. It is surely difficult for me to picture how certain rotor motors on flagellum evolved with such precision, as it is for most people, but perhaps it is also hard for most people as well as myself to take into account the sheer numbers of years that could have been devoted to the construction of such a rotor.
Regardless of my opinion ID has been approached as a watered down form of Creation Science in the Dover Trial, and in my mind will continue to be approached as such until such facts may or may not arise to prove and/or disprove the theory.