My claim is that any claims of the future or far past as being either merged or physical only are not supportable! You can't do it, no one can, it is a belief, an assumption only with no basis whatsoever in reality, except, 'gee, that's the way it now works, guess it always will'
You are correct.
It matters that it predicts things against the majority belief in some countries, with NO proof! This is new to you? If you want to say the sun will burn out, when the bible says it is forever, or our galaxy will crash, when the bible says God is going to move to earth to live forever, no, we don't want, many of us, children being taught baseless fantasies!
Well, they are not baseless. They are based on the assumption that what we see today is what has always been.
You said it was not necessary to back up the claim that the past was the same, and natural only as the present. If all old ages are based on the premise, you absolutely must.
Nope. Don't have to as long as the predictions continue to hold true. There's no reason to assume otherwise.
Now prove it was the same in Adam's day?!
Impossible. BTW, Adam didn't
actually exist. Genesis is a fairy tale. Prove me wrong.
But they hold true for me as well, cause the real ones deal with the present. No one questions these. The future and far past is another matter.
Not when they are assumed to be the same. Science has no reason to assume otherwise.