I do not believe that Creation1 is on the right track. I used to be a christian, by the way. anyway, Creation1 refuses to accept anything of science. "A little" closed minded". Creation1 said that he/she would not even debate, and that if we read the bible there WOULDN'T be debate. Fortunately, we have an evolutionist in here who has the read the bible, and did not take it literally.
Creation1 insisted that he/she was right, but then refused to support her claim. Clearly he/she is simply operating on a platform of faith and denial.
i myself am not closed-minded. As i said, I was a christian, but now I'm not. If a creationist came to me with convincing and credible evidence that Bible was indeed true, i'd listen. But as far as I'm concerned, Creationism is based on faith and the twisting of facts that originally support evolution. Just listen to you speculate about the age of the Pyramid, and erosion of the sphinx. This is all speculation. whenever something doesn't make sense in the Bible, some new fact or new revelation is created. At least science isn't making up things.
Meanwhile, you have called me unintelligent and close-minded, and accused me of violating copyright laws, which most certainly did not. This really isn't impressive.