Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems of a different "Kind"
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2523 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 75 of 92 (423339)
09-21-2007 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by IamJoseph
09-21-2007 10:45 AM


Re: 100% riddles
water/ocean life, and referred to 'after its kind' - after water based life forms.
Fantastic! So all "water based life forms" are one kind. So, trout, whales, jellyfish, penguins, sea snakes, shimp, tube worms, walruses and sponges all decended from the one pair of "water kind" animals Noah took on his Ark.
And then all "air kind" animals - dragon flies, bats, eagles, mosquitos, decended from the "air kind" pair.
And all the worms, badgers, elephants, kangaroos, lemurs, cheetahs and squirels deceneded from the "land kind" pair.
Now, if you would be so kind, can you describe to me what this 6,000 year old ancestor of both kangroos and earthworms looked like? How about the sponge/walrus? The mosquito/bat?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by IamJoseph, posted 09-21-2007 10:45 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2523 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 78 of 92 (423347)
09-21-2007 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by IamJoseph
09-21-2007 11:50 AM


Re: GENESIS IS 100% SCIENTIFIC AND NON-METAPHORIC: WHEN THERE IS NO PARANOIA.
If the text has no superflous words, one must take more seriously the term 'every living creature that swarms and/or creapeth'.
Okay, let's assume you are correct and logical (a big assumption, but I'm willing to go with it if you are).
You've made a logic statement here:
IF (the text has) "no superfluous words" THEN (one must take more seriously) "the term".
Conversely -
If the text does in fact HAVE superfluous words THEN we must NOT take these terms seriously.
Right? I mean, after all this is YOUR claim not mine.
By the way
"Superfluous" is defined as:
"1. being more than is sufficient or required; excessive.
2. unnecessary or needless."
So let's take a look at the creation of man:
Gen 1:27 " 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them."
Gen 2:22 " 22And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man."
Gen 5:2 " 2Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created."
There's 3 passages give the same information - they are, by definition superfluous.
Therefore we must NOT take these passages seriously.
Thank you, you are finished.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by IamJoseph, posted 09-21-2007 11:50 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by IamJoseph, posted 09-21-2007 10:26 PM Nuggin has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2523 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 87 of 92 (423425)
09-22-2007 1:45 AM
Reply to: Message 83 by IamJoseph
09-21-2007 10:26 PM


Circular
So, according to you --
The Bible is true because it's so perfectly written, and you know that it's perfectly written because the Bible is true.
I'm reminded of Colbert's saying -
The Bible is infailable because it says so in the Bible, which if you remember from the beginning of this sentence is infailable.
You are free to believe whatever you want, so long as your beliefs don't enter into our schools in either the fields of science or logic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by IamJoseph, posted 09-21-2007 10:26 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by IamJoseph, posted 09-22-2007 2:16 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024