Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pesky Starlight
Taco
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 37 (10788)
06-01-2002 10:53 AM


I was reading through the previous posts in this forum and have some questions to anyone who feels like answering.
1) If the earth has time going slower than the rest of the universe (i.e. days versus billions of years) then it must have been in an incredibly high gravitational field, right? Yet how could the earth have existed in such a high field? Surely it would have been crushed or something like that.
2) In a previous post I read that Humphrey's theory postulates a expansion that is slowing down because of a central point of gravity. How does that correspond to recent discoveries of an increasing rate of expansion?
3) I read about 'spheres of water' 2 LY across in order to create 'white holes'. Is there any reason to assume such a thing?
I am interested in the dicussion between creation science and mainstream science, and would appreciate any comments people might have.
Cheers.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024